I thought this image could have been much more... certainly didn't quite turn as impacting as I had pictured in my mind.
Anyone care to fix-me-up-before-you-go-go?
shuttertalk Wrote:I thought this image could have been much more... certainly didn't quite turn as impacting as I had pictured in my mind.
In your mind, I'll bet it glowed ...
1. Rotated (left-to-right flow seems more natural) and cropped square
2. Adjusted levels (original is a little underexposed.)
3. Used my
velvia action set to high-contrast, level 70
4. Added layer set to "multiply" and adjusted opacity and gamma to taste
5. Used my
soft focus action with an edge mask
6. Framed
About 1 minute's worth of work
Wow! I love it! I could frame that on my wall!!
Haha. This is what I mean about photoshop. A couple minutes of mild editing and your shot looks fabulous!

Very nice version of the picture, slejhamer. Here is my try
![[Image: stleaf.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/stleaf.jpg)
Wow Slej, that really makes the subject of the photo stand out as well as giving the result I think ST was after...
<$0.02>
The only thing I would have done different, is that I am not quite 100% on the black frame. I would think that a different colour .. perhaps a neutral brown.. or a little more red than brown might have worked???
I'm not a colour theorist, the black certainly gives an edge to the picture...
</$0.02>
Hi Irma... your version looks like the sort of work Don Schaeffer does!

Irma - I like that effect. Almost like aged plaster.
GD: I almost always use black or white frames now for web posting ... laziness, I suppose, as I used to experiment more. But pics we frame at home never get black frames! Wouldn't go with the decor.

hehe... that's ok then Slej

I remember when I was framing up my telescope picture, 3 places I went to suggested black frames... and you just look at em and say.. "y'know.. the photograph is BLUE!"... so the next place I went to immediately framed it in blue and pink (to highlight the rail).. and it looks great... I guess the difference between my point and reality is that the frame was on the image rather than the real frame.