Sep 17, 2012, 00:11
This makes my blood boil but here's how the topless photos of the princess were taken. Basically, the photos were taken from a public road, approximately 800m to 1.3km away (roughly 0.5 to 0.8 of a mile). They are suggesting that a 600mm lens with 2x teleconverter could have been used.
[attachment=583]
http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/celeb...261a1.html
I think it's very poor form - if they are in a private residence, it's an invasion of their privacy whether it's someone 1m away with a cellphone or 1km away with a long lens. Someone should do the same with these "photographers" and their families in their own backyards, and post the photos all over the internet and see how they like the treatment. Ironically, they would probably be charged with invasion of privacy and stalking.
[attachment=583]
http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/celeb...261a1.html
I think it's very poor form - if they are in a private residence, it's an invasion of their privacy whether it's someone 1m away with a cellphone or 1km away with a long lens. Someone should do the same with these "photographers" and their families in their own backyards, and post the photos all over the internet and see how they like the treatment. Ironically, they would probably be charged with invasion of privacy and stalking.