Jul 9, 2014, 12:47
Jul 10, 2014, 09:58
Great capture. As shot, or, any post editing. Ed.
Jul 10, 2014, 14:51
I'm with Ed (above).
Please provide some details of camera, lens, settings and any work in post. We're not being nosy, just interested.
Best regards.
Phil.
Please provide some details of camera, lens, settings and any work in post. We're not being nosy, just interested.
Best regards.
Phil.
Jul 10, 2014, 15:27
(Jul 10, 2014, 09:58)EdMak Wrote: [ -> ]Great capture. As shot, or, any post editing. Ed.
As shot with Canon 7D and Canon EOS 100-400 IS Lens.
Feb 18, 2015, 03:47
Beautiful capture of a beautiful bird. Looks good as it is to me.
Regards
Jane
Regards
Jane
Feb 18, 2015, 04:42
Superb shot, and the only alteration I would suggest is to remove the tree trunk (if that's what it is) at the top right. I too would appreciate some info on the gear used and possibly your location.
Peter
Peter
Feb 18, 2015, 05:59
Camera details above, and, Les has not visited the site since 12 Nov, last year. Ed.
Feb 18, 2015, 10:18
Great shot... agree with Peter re the trunk... and Ed would be a fan of a little sharpening... 
I hope you don't mind, I have sharpened and cropped your image so that you have a visual on the comment. It is your image and only you know how it should look.
Good camera and a really good lens too...
[attachment=4301]
Kind regards
Rolf

I hope you don't mind, I have sharpened and cropped your image so that you have a visual on the comment. It is your image and only you know how it should look.
Good camera and a really good lens too...

[attachment=4301]
Kind regards
Rolf
Feb 18, 2015, 13:54
I prefer the original because sharpening has harshened the neck and finer back feathers. Always a risk of losing fine detail when sharpening images of fauna when fur and feather are predominant.