Dec 8, 2005, 14:00
Hey guys,
I'm just in the process of putting one of my cars up for sale at the moment, and I wanted to take a nice "product shot" of it for the advert.
I took this shot a couple of days ago. It wasn't really planned, but I had just finished cleaning and polishing the car and noticed the light was good and there were some storm clouds rolling in, so I dashed off to this grass field next to the lake about 1km from my house to snap a few quick shots and then get the car back in the garage before it started raining.
One thing I've found is that it is quite difficult to shoot a black car and maintain a lot of detail in it without seriously blowing out the sky or making the picture look too fake. This shot has had the sky masked out and had different tone curves applied to the sky and the car, but all the detail of the reflections and so on were in the original photo - I just played with tone curves and colour a bit (and some slight vignetting to give it more of a moody feel). But dispite my efforts, I still think the front RH corner (the corner of the car closest to the camera) is still a bit dark and lacking detail.
I also deliberately blew out the sky in the top right a bit and reduced some of the contrast in the gravel on the bottom left, as I intend to overlay some text in these areas for adverts to put up on the noticeboard at work, etc.. I can post a version with text if you like, but I wanted opinions mainly on the photo itself.
Any comments and suggestions on the image would be great thanks.. both from it being a photo in its own right and also as a piece of advertising.
For example, you might think the wide-angle of the shot (16mm, 25mm full-frame equiv) looks good from an aesthetic point of view, but it might not be a good way to advertise the car.
Cheers
Adrian
![[Image: IMG_9513_770.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/IMG_9513_770.jpg)
I'm just in the process of putting one of my cars up for sale at the moment, and I wanted to take a nice "product shot" of it for the advert.
I took this shot a couple of days ago. It wasn't really planned, but I had just finished cleaning and polishing the car and noticed the light was good and there were some storm clouds rolling in, so I dashed off to this grass field next to the lake about 1km from my house to snap a few quick shots and then get the car back in the garage before it started raining.
One thing I've found is that it is quite difficult to shoot a black car and maintain a lot of detail in it without seriously blowing out the sky or making the picture look too fake. This shot has had the sky masked out and had different tone curves applied to the sky and the car, but all the detail of the reflections and so on were in the original photo - I just played with tone curves and colour a bit (and some slight vignetting to give it more of a moody feel). But dispite my efforts, I still think the front RH corner (the corner of the car closest to the camera) is still a bit dark and lacking detail.
I also deliberately blew out the sky in the top right a bit and reduced some of the contrast in the gravel on the bottom left, as I intend to overlay some text in these areas for adverts to put up on the noticeboard at work, etc.. I can post a version with text if you like, but I wanted opinions mainly on the photo itself.
Any comments and suggestions on the image would be great thanks.. both from it being a photo in its own right and also as a piece of advertising.
For example, you might think the wide-angle of the shot (16mm, 25mm full-frame equiv) looks good from an aesthetic point of view, but it might not be a good way to advertise the car.
Cheers
Adrian
![[Image: IMG_9513_770.jpg]](http://www.shuttertalk.com/forums/images/upload/IMG_9513_770.jpg)