Apr 4, 2006, 00:49
The legal ramifications of being a photographer in this day and age seem to be often discussed and opinionated about on photography forums, but not backed up by much fact.
This is in no small part due to the fact that the people who participate in photography forums are often located in different countries and are covered by different laws - so when these things get discussed invariably the conversation becomes vague or misleading.
Well I have just stumbled across an excellent article written by Andrew Nemeth, a photographer with a Law degree.
While the article is quite specific to Australian law (in fact NSW law), it contains excellent links at the end for people in other countries to get the same kind of information with regards to their own local laws.
And for those Australians who don't live in NSW, it seems to me that this article is probably 98% applicable to other states as well. There may be a couple of obscure or subtle differences in some states (NSW seems to have specific workplace surveillance laws for example), but I'm fairly certain the general guidelines are just as relevent.
It even includes a very handy little 2-page PDF written for you to download, print to have handy in your camera bag.... kind of an FAQ of legal rights and responsibilities for both photographer and subject. If you ever get questioned in the street, it could be a very handy resource to pull out and discuss - not just in an "I'm right and you're wrong" kind of way, but it is written in such a way that it could actually help diffuse a heated situation and reassure an irate or involuntary subject that the person behind the camera really is being respectful to others and trying to behave within a clearly-defined ethical and legal framework. Good stuff.
Oh, and I also found a number of myths dispelled and murky terms clarified as well. Things like the definition of a "Commercial Photograph" which was quite a surprise to me. Also the cases behind some recent news stories are discussed and clarified (local councils banning photography at beaches and swimming pools, photographers being assaulted or having gear confiscated, etc).
But stop reading what I'm saying about it... and go read the article itself! (And scroll down for other links if you are a non-Aussie).
http://4020.net/unposed/photorights.shtml
This is in no small part due to the fact that the people who participate in photography forums are often located in different countries and are covered by different laws - so when these things get discussed invariably the conversation becomes vague or misleading.
Well I have just stumbled across an excellent article written by Andrew Nemeth, a photographer with a Law degree.
While the article is quite specific to Australian law (in fact NSW law), it contains excellent links at the end for people in other countries to get the same kind of information with regards to their own local laws.
And for those Australians who don't live in NSW, it seems to me that this article is probably 98% applicable to other states as well. There may be a couple of obscure or subtle differences in some states (NSW seems to have specific workplace surveillance laws for example), but I'm fairly certain the general guidelines are just as relevent.
It even includes a very handy little 2-page PDF written for you to download, print to have handy in your camera bag.... kind of an FAQ of legal rights and responsibilities for both photographer and subject. If you ever get questioned in the street, it could be a very handy resource to pull out and discuss - not just in an "I'm right and you're wrong" kind of way, but it is written in such a way that it could actually help diffuse a heated situation and reassure an irate or involuntary subject that the person behind the camera really is being respectful to others and trying to behave within a clearly-defined ethical and legal framework. Good stuff.
Oh, and I also found a number of myths dispelled and murky terms clarified as well. Things like the definition of a "Commercial Photograph" which was quite a surprise to me. Also the cases behind some recent news stories are discussed and clarified (local councils banning photography at beaches and swimming pools, photographers being assaulted or having gear confiscated, etc).
But stop reading what I'm saying about it... and go read the article itself! (And scroll down for other links if you are a non-Aussie).
http://4020.net/unposed/photorights.shtml