Oct 13, 2007, 00:49
I got a call from UPS yesterday saying that I owed them a heap of money for import fees... but instead of being sad I was excited because it meant my new lenses had arrived!
I got them home last night and haven't had much of a chance to play with them yet. I've taken a few shots around the house and done some boring tests to compare them with some of my other lenses, but I haven't gone out to take some "proper" photos yet.
However, my initial thoughts are WOW!
The Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM in particular is amazing. I bought it to replace my existing 70-200 f/4L, and I wasn't sure if the extra cost would be worth it. I've always loved the shots from my f/4L so it would have to be a good copy of the f/2.8L IS to beat it... and it does! The new lens is every bit as sharp at f/2.8 as the old one is at f/4, and when the new lens is stopped down to f/4 it is noticably sharper than the old lens at f/4. The extra stop max aperture is fantastic, and the IS is also brilliant. The AF is very fast and accurate too. The size, weight, and cost are the only negative things I can think of - although not a lot bigger, it weighs in at double the weight of the old lens.
1. Great colour, contrast, and it's sharp wide open which is great.
2. Auto-focus is very fast and accurate too. This is Rocket hiding in the grass.
3. Tina is getting her hair cut short today, so I snuck in a quick "before" shot.
4. I tested the IS with Rocket in a poorly-lit room last night. This shot certainly isn't as sharp as it could be, but considering it's hand-held at 1/8th of a second for a 200mm focal length, it blows me away.
The other lens I bought was the Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L USM to replace my EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM (EF-S lenses won't work on the 1.3x crop factor body of a 1DMk3). Optically this lens seems just as good as the 70-200 f/2.8L IS (comparable with prime lenses), but I know I'll miss the IS of my old 17-85 in a walk-around lens. Still, the max aperture is more important to me than IS (which is why I didn't get the 24-105 f/4L IS). The AF is nice and smooth, but there is no "AF Range" switch which appears on many other L lenses that allows AF to speed up significantly by limiting the AF sweep range to half its normal range (eg 2.5m - infinity). I am extremely happy with the IQ of this lens, but I wish it had the same IS and AF features as the 70-200 f/2.8L IS.
Still, it's the images that matter at the end of the day.
5. Danni looking out the glass doors in the kitchen. The 24-70 really has wonderful colour and contrast and a lovely bokeh.
6. With some cheap eBay Macro extension tubes, the 24-70 makes a decent makeshift macro lens. This is a daddy-long-legs (or similar) spider in my garage.
Now... all I'm waiting for is my 1D Mk3 body and new crumpler bag to arrive! Hopefully next week.
I also have some interest in my 30D body and the 2 lenses being replaced, which means I might be able to afford to buy food again soon!
I got them home last night and haven't had much of a chance to play with them yet. I've taken a few shots around the house and done some boring tests to compare them with some of my other lenses, but I haven't gone out to take some "proper" photos yet.
However, my initial thoughts are WOW!
The Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM in particular is amazing. I bought it to replace my existing 70-200 f/4L, and I wasn't sure if the extra cost would be worth it. I've always loved the shots from my f/4L so it would have to be a good copy of the f/2.8L IS to beat it... and it does! The new lens is every bit as sharp at f/2.8 as the old one is at f/4, and when the new lens is stopped down to f/4 it is noticably sharper than the old lens at f/4. The extra stop max aperture is fantastic, and the IS is also brilliant. The AF is very fast and accurate too. The size, weight, and cost are the only negative things I can think of - although not a lot bigger, it weighs in at double the weight of the old lens.
1. Great colour, contrast, and it's sharp wide open which is great.
2. Auto-focus is very fast and accurate too. This is Rocket hiding in the grass.
3. Tina is getting her hair cut short today, so I snuck in a quick "before" shot.
4. I tested the IS with Rocket in a poorly-lit room last night. This shot certainly isn't as sharp as it could be, but considering it's hand-held at 1/8th of a second for a 200mm focal length, it blows me away.
The other lens I bought was the Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8L USM to replace my EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM (EF-S lenses won't work on the 1.3x crop factor body of a 1DMk3). Optically this lens seems just as good as the 70-200 f/2.8L IS (comparable with prime lenses), but I know I'll miss the IS of my old 17-85 in a walk-around lens. Still, the max aperture is more important to me than IS (which is why I didn't get the 24-105 f/4L IS). The AF is nice and smooth, but there is no "AF Range" switch which appears on many other L lenses that allows AF to speed up significantly by limiting the AF sweep range to half its normal range (eg 2.5m - infinity). I am extremely happy with the IQ of this lens, but I wish it had the same IS and AF features as the 70-200 f/2.8L IS.
Still, it's the images that matter at the end of the day.
5. Danni looking out the glass doors in the kitchen. The 24-70 really has wonderful colour and contrast and a lovely bokeh.
6. With some cheap eBay Macro extension tubes, the 24-70 makes a decent makeshift macro lens. This is a daddy-long-legs (or similar) spider in my garage.
Now... all I'm waiting for is my 1D Mk3 body and new crumpler bag to arrive! Hopefully next week.
I also have some interest in my 30D body and the 2 lenses being replaced, which means I might be able to afford to buy food again soon!